Services Optimization
A structured review of your application and infrastructure for known weaknesses, with findings ranked and fixes recommended.

Fit
Usually the right call when one of these sounds familiar.
The product has been live without an outside look.
Someone is asking whether it has been checked.
Libraries have not been updated for a long time.
Nobody is sure who can reach what.
Not the right service? Fixing slow pages: Performance. Finding functional faults: QA & testing.
Scope
The review is scoped in writing and reported in plain language. Each piece of work has a matching thing you receive.
The application checked against the OWASP Top 10 and your own risks.
Each weakness described, with how it could be used and how serious it is.
Libraries and packages checked for known vulnerabilities.
A list of dependencies with the issues found and the updates needed.
Cloud settings, secrets handling, roles and permissions reviewed.
A clear picture of who and what can reach your systems.
Fixes proposed in priority order, with effort and risk stated.
A written list your team can work through, or ask us to.
Use cases
Practical situations where this service is put to work. Open a card to see how it applies.
A structured check of a new application for common weaknesses before it faces the public.
A review of the libraries, secrets and cloud settings behind a product that has been live for some time.
A written review you can share when a customer or partner asks how your product is protected.
Sample use cases, drafted as placeholders. The Plethora team confirms the final list.
Process
Four stops, agreed with you as we go. Each shows what we do and what we need from you.
We agree what is in scope, what is off limits and how testing will be done, in writing.
You give written permission and name a contact for urgent findings.
We review the application, dependencies and configuration, using tools and manual checks.
You provide access to code, environments and documentation as agreed.
We write up each finding with its severity, evidence and recommended fix.
You read the report and ask us about anything unclear.
We walk your team through the findings and retest the fixes you make.
You decide what to fix and when, and tell us when to retest.
Quality
How the work is checked, accepted and passed to you.
Nothing is tested outside what you have agreed in writing.
So your developers can see the problem for themselves.
So the most serious issues are fixed first.
Findings are shared only with the people you name.
Tools
Tools we use in delivery. We choose them to suit your team, and the list does not imply any partnership. Logos belong to their owners.
Engagement
A defined review with a written report and a walk-through.
Our engineers work with yours on security as part of delivery.
Reviews repeated as the product and its dependencies change.
Scope and cost are confirmed with you in writing before work starts.
FAQ
It is a structured review of your application and infrastructure for known weaknesses. We agree the scope and the methods with you in writing before work starts.
No. The report is a record of what we found and recommend. It is not a certification, and the OWASP Top 10 is a reference we work from.
Yes, if you ask us to. Otherwise your team can work through the recommendations.
We prefer a test environment. If we must test live, we agree the limits and the timing with you first.
Tell us what you run today and we will come back with next steps.
Talk to usRelated